This entry was posted on Friday, December 16th, 2011 at 3:29 pm and is filed under Microsoft, Novell. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Jurors in Novell-Microsoft case ask court about meaning of ‘hung jury’
SALT LAKE CITY — Jurors in the billion-dollar Novell-Microsoft antitrust case are apparently wrestling with a number of questions, including what a “hung jury” means.
The seven-woman, seven-man jury was expected to continue deliberations Friday. Jurors have asked the court for several clarifications since receiving the case Wednesday morning. Twice it asked about the term hung jury, possibly signaling that might be on their minds as they weigh two months of complex testimony and hundreds of documents.
Attorneys for both sides wrapped up their cases Tuesday with closing arguments in U.S. District Court.
Novell alleges Microsoft violated antitrust laws during the development of Windows 95, putting the Provo-based company’s newly acquired WordPerfect word processing software at a competitive disadvantage and allowing Microsoft to gain a monopoly in the computer operating systems market.
Microsoft contends Novell bought a dying company in WordPerfect and was slow to recognize the emergence of Windows. It argued that delays in development of Novell’s spread sheet application slowed the release of its software for Windows 95.
Novell seeks as much as $1.3 billion in compensation. Microsoft says the Provo-based company deserves nothing…
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705395917/Jurors-in-Novell-Microsoft-case-ask-court-about-meaning-of-hung-jury.html

